Donald Trump said the bombing caused “monumental damage” to Iran’s nuclear facilities, during an announcement on tensions between Iran and Israel.
The situation in the Middle East is escalating dramatically. In a recent speech, Donald Trump claimed that the US bombing had caused “monumental damage” to Iran’s nuclear facilities, an event that could mark a turning point in the tense relations between the country and Israel. The consequences of this offensive are already palpable, both military and diplomatic.
Trump speaks of “monumental damage” after the strikes in Iran
In his speech after the strikes, Trump used strong words to describe the extent of the destruction inflicted. According to him, “total destruction is the right word,” emphasizing that the most significant impacts had been recorded deep below ground level. This statement, broadcast live from the White House, sparked strong reactions not only in Iran but also internationally.
Details of the bombings on nuclear facilities
The bombings, which targeted three key sites of Iran’s nuclear program, include Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan. The damage caused is controversial, with experts cautious about assessing the actual destruction. An advisor to Iran’s Supreme Leader indicated that the country maintains stockpiles of enriched uranium, stating that “the game is not over.” This context fuels fears of an escalation of the conflict.
| Bombed Site | Location | Nature of Facilities |
|---|---|---|
| Fordo | Near Qom | Uranium Enrichment |
| Natanz | Isfahan Province | Enrichment Plants |
| Isfahan | Isfahan Province | Various Nuclear Facilities |
Threats of Retaliation and Rising Tensions
Tehran reacted firmly to the strikes, and a spokesperson for the Iranian armed forces warned of “serious consequences” for the United States. This situation could expand Iran’s range of legitimate targets, which, according to analysts, creates a climate conducive to open warfare and armed escalation:
- Threat of attacks on US bases in the Middle East.
- Mobilization of regional allies, including groups like Hezbollah.
- Risks of a protracted war that could further destabilize the region.
International Reactions to the Escalation
Reactions to this situation were swift. Countries such as Russia and China condemned the strikes, citing tensions that could destabilize the Middle East. Germany, meanwhile, expressed support for the US action as a necessary response to a concrete threat.
France, for its part, remains cautious, urging against a military escalation. Sources indicate that the French government is considering organizing evacuations for its nationals in Israel.
| Country | Reaction |
|---|---|
| Russia | Condemnation of the strikes, pacifism suggested. |
| China | Call for dialogue and negotiation. |
| Germany | Support for the offensive against an imminent threat. |
| France | Call for de-escalation and diplomacy. |
Tension between Iran and Israel, exacerbated by the bombings, could lead to future clashes. The international community is on alert for the possibility of military conflict, while diplomatic avenues appear to be narrowing. The decisions made in the coming days by the actors involved will be crucial in determining whether peace can be restored or whether the conflict escalates further.
